<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Are You?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.thefurryone.net/2007/10/01/way-to-go-for-the-obvious-joke-there/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.thefurryone.net/2007/10/01/way-to-go-for-the-obvious-joke-there/</link>
	<description>Ramblings and musings of John Zeitler.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonny</title>
		<link>http://blog.thefurryone.net/2007/10/01/way-to-go-for-the-obvious-joke-there/#comment-14385</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 01:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thefurryone.net/2007/10/01/way-to-go-for-the-obvious-joke-there/#comment-14385</guid>
		<description>And as a side note, I am not sure if they new ones can switch to flamethrower the same way or not. As a race who time travels it gets all a bit confusing about what they can do when.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And as a side note, I am not sure if they new ones can switch to flamethrower the same way or not. As a race who time travels it gets all a bit confusing about what they can do when.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny</title>
		<link>http://blog.thefurryone.net/2007/10/01/way-to-go-for-the-obvious-joke-there/#comment-14384</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 01:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thefurryone.net/2007/10/01/way-to-go-for-the-obvious-joke-there/#comment-14384</guid>
		<description>I loved Eccleston to bits. I think I related to him more though as he grew up near me. I've been told I sound like him when I read out loud sometimes, heh. I find Tennant to be overly silly at times, alot more so than the other Doctors.

As for the Dalek weaponary, the new generation daleks can more actively "switch" their output. Previous generations had top physically switch their weaponry. Now they have stun, extermination and this electrical type of attack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved Eccleston to bits. I think I related to him more though as he grew up near me. I&#8217;ve been told I sound like him when I read out loud sometimes, heh. I find Tennant to be overly silly at times, alot more so than the other Doctors.</p>
<p>As for the Dalek weaponary, the new generation daleks can more actively &#8220;switch&#8221; their output. Previous generations had top physically switch their weaponry. Now they have stun, extermination and this electrical type of attack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blog.thefurryone.net/2007/10/01/way-to-go-for-the-obvious-joke-there/#comment-14368</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thefurryone.net/2007/10/01/way-to-go-for-the-obvious-joke-there/#comment-14368</guid>
		<description>Well, now I know what to look for in the old stories, I suppose.

Eccleston does seem to be playing up the 'tough guy' aspect a little too much, but that could just be residual attention I have from his turn as the villain in Gone in 60 Seconds...  I'm assuming that the previous Doctors are a bit less aggressive or brusque (though during preliminary research I found that each one is different, of course).  Still, I can see why there's some consternation there-- he's not exactly fitting what I'd previously been led to expect (secondhand) from the Doctor.  I'm looking forward to seeing Tennant's turn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, now I know what to look for in the old stories, I suppose.</p>
<p>Eccleston does seem to be playing up the &#8216;tough guy&#8217; aspect a little too much, but that could just be residual attention I have from his turn as the villain in Gone in 60 Seconds&#8230;  I&#8217;m assuming that the previous Doctors are a bit less aggressive or brusque (though during preliminary research I found that each one is different, of course).  Still, I can see why there&#8217;s some consternation there&#8211; he&#8217;s not exactly fitting what I&#8217;d previously been led to expect (secondhand) from the Doctor.  I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing Tennant&#8217;s turn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Adcock</title>
		<link>http://blog.thefurryone.net/2007/10/01/way-to-go-for-the-obvious-joke-there/#comment-14341</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Adcock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 03:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thefurryone.net/2007/10/01/way-to-go-for-the-obvious-joke-there/#comment-14341</guid>
		<description>As much as I like Doctor Who, I've watched only three episodes with Eccleston, and I might never watch the rest.  Either he was miscast or he's misplaying the part, but he just isn't the Doctor.  But, almost everybody else thinks he's great, so what do I know.

Tennant is very good, but Tom Baker is still the one to beat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I like Doctor Who, I&#8217;ve watched only three episodes with Eccleston, and I might never watch the rest.  Either he was miscast or he&#8217;s misplaying the part, but he just isn&#8217;t the Doctor.  But, almost everybody else thinks he&#8217;s great, so what do I know.</p>
<p>Tennant is very good, but Tom Baker is still the one to beat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
